- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:07:48 -0500
- To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> Never mind. I misunderstood your test. Yes, Safari fails that test,
> but shouldn't it? It seems like it should be forward-compatible and
> not assume the whole rule is invalid.
See http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#q10
CSS2 has the same language ("CSS2 gives a special meaning to the comma ...") at
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/syndata.html#q8
What does Safari do when confronted with the selector:
"body, foo - bar, foo < baz"? Does it apply the rule? If not, how is this any
different from the unrecognized pseudo case?
Boris
--
Conway's Law:
In any organization there will always be one person
who knows what is going on. This person must be fired.
Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 17:19:20 UTC