W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2003

Re: CSS 4?

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 02:07:09 +0200
Message-ID: <1839301024.20031024020709@w3.org>
To: Daniel Glazman <danielglazman@easyconnect.fr>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, daniel@glazman.org

On Thursday, October 23, 2003, 9:29:34 AM, Daniel wrote:


DG> Tantek Çelik wrote:

>> Which do you think is more successful in the market?
>> 
>> Which do you think is easier to author?
>> 
>> Which is showing active development (new specs, features being published)?
>> 
>> Which is more actively discussed on mailing lists?

DG> LOL!!!!

Even funnier if you give the answers.

DG> I could add a corollary to the first question above : if you are
DG> not a professionnal of markup languages, have you _ever_ viewed a
DG> web page styled with a style language not being CSS ?

If you have viewed a page that was styled by XSLT into 'HTML for
presentation' then how would you know? Although it might well have
some CSS too, thus counting in both categories.

-- 
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2003 20:07:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:24 GMT