W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2003

Re: [css3-cascade] Proposed property: rule( sSelector );

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:30:19 -0500
Message-ID: <3F96401B.8090704@mit.edu>
To: Chris Moschini <cmoschini@myrealbox.com>, www-style@w3.org



Chris Moschini wrote:
> Thanks. I think it can also help alleviate the common gripe CSS users have of
> "there is no not() selector"

I assume this not() selector would not do the same thing as the :not() 
pseudo-class in CSS3 Selectors does?

> I think that the rule() function (or property) would obey the normal CSS rules
> of cascade and specificity with the addition that selectors called through rule()
> are less specific than properties at the same level, thus, given:

So this "rule" thing is cumulative, then?  In other words, any rule that 
matches an element and has this "rule" construct makes more rules match 
the element.  Except at a different point in the cascade.... right?

-Boris
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 04:34:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:24 GMT