On 13 Oct 2003 at 15:03, Ian Hickson wrote: > I believe the spec does say this. Oh perhaps it does. It seems i was trying to figure this out the wrong way around with false assumptions on what the block formatting contexts meant. Since floats are covered, items with non-initial overflow does not need any explanation, table-cells are covered (by UA specific...) i suppose the only issue might be inline-block:s. That is a very minor issue if it isen't covered already by virtue of being shrink-wrapped, eg cell-like. The adjacent bit was a part of my confused idea of what a block formatting context was, and made me think they should always be cleared rather than pseudo-floated. Thanks for filling me in, /StaffanReceived on Monday, 13 October 2003 12:37:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:21:59 GMT