W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2003

Re: OT: Reply-to

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 09:31:25 +0100
Message-ID: <1772663169.20031122093125@w3.org>
To: Dris <dris86@cox.net>
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org

On Saturday, November 22, 2003, 6:32:45 AM, Dris wrote:

D> I see the point, thanks for pointing that out.  Then again, I think
D> accidentally sending a private message to a list is a little far 
D> fetched,

No, its happened, more than once, including to me.

D>  considering the reply would be to a list message (that, and
D> I've previously expected my replies to go there).  Anyways, I'm 
D> satisfied with that response (and I never could figure out a practical
D> use for "Reply All"... now I know).

D> On Nov 21, 2003, at 8:40 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

>> * Dris wrote:
>>> This is off topic, but I'd like to know why the list doesn't use
>>> Reply-to in the headers.  I've seen it in countless other lists.  With
>>> Reply-to, replying to someone's message will automatically put
>>> www-style into the TO: field.  Several times I've accidentally sent
>>> messages to other users in the list instead of the list itself.  A
>>> little frustrating.  Would this be possible to add to the www-style
>>> message list?
>> http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Reply-To%3A+munging%22
D> ________
D> "Irony is a voluntary survey with required fields."
D> 	~ Dris ~

 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 22 November 2003 03:31:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:10 UTC