Re: an alternative to the 'position' property allowing more precise control

From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:40:29 +0100
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <3E81C9ED.3060807@netscape.com>

Stuart Ballard wrote:

> Also I think that "top" and "bottom" are interchanged in the first CSS 
> rule - ie, it should read:
>
>   top: previous bottom 10px; 

Absolutely. Fixed. Thanks.

</Daniel>

Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2003 10:40:10 UTC