W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2003

Re: an alternative to the 'position' property allowing more precise control

From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:40:29 +0100
Message-ID: <3E81C9ED.3060807@netscape.com>
To: www-style@w3.org


Stuart Ballard wrote:

> Also I think that "top" and "bottom" are interchanged in the first CSS 
> rule - ie, it should read:
>
>   top: previous bottom 10px; 

Absolutely. Fixed. Thanks.

</Daniel>

Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2003 10:40:10 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Glazman: "Re: an alternative to the 'position' property allowing more precise control"
Previous message: Stuart Ballard: "Re: an alternative to the 'position' property allowing more precise control"
In reply to: Stuart Ballard: "Re: an alternative to the 'position' property allowing more precise control"
Next in thread: Daniel Glazman: "Re: an alternative to the 'position' property allowing more precise control"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:20 GMT