> > Any comments on ::first-page and nth-page? > > I do not find these pseudo-elements especially useful. If given the > choice between an implementation that degrades performance and the > omission of this feature, I would choose omission. They would not degrade performance, as they can be processed in a single pass in much the same way as ::first-line. Given that I find them useful, and they do not degrade performance, are there any objections to them? (Incidentally, CSS users interested in performance would do well to remove the various pseudo-classes added to CSS3 Selectors, such as :nth-last-of-type, which cannot be applied without lookahead). MichaelReceived on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 11:07:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:20 GMT