W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2003

CSS3 Selectors CR - Possible eratum

From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 03:14:19 -0500
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <3E641A0B.24627.2ADA2CE@localhost>


In the example in Section 9, shouldn't the specificity of the the last 
example #s12:not(FOO) be 111 instead of 101 because of the :not?

Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 03:15:13 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Etan Wexler: "Re: CSS2.1, CSS3: Background-Attachment"
Previous message: Ernest Cline: "(Fwd) Re: How to interpret E:enabled:first-of-type"
Next in thread: Etan Wexler: "Re: CSS3 Selectors CR - Possible eratum"
Reply: Etan Wexler: "Re: CSS3 Selectors CR - Possible eratum"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:20 GMT