Robin Berjon wrote: >> What kind of functions are you thinking about? > > XPath functions. Nothing keeps one from adding some. > css:first-line(/foo//bar). Ah. I see. No, of course -- it would be nice to have CSS take advantage of the work being done on XPath in *any* way, but I don't think the functions are enough. >> Because I think XPath has better syntax and is better fitted >> for the pure task of selecting nodes than the existing CSS >> selectors. > > That judgement seems very subjective to me :) Of course it is! :) But as Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer has proven; I don't stand alone on this one. What syntax the language has (and not only functionality) means something. It means a lot, actually. > I would like to take the time to work through a one to one > comparison between CSS and XPath. Hopefully this week-end if I > get the time. Great! I can barely wait to see the results. :) -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- X-No-Archive: No "He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away"Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 06:19:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:22 GMT