On Thursday, July 24, 2003, 1:14:29 PM, Ian wrote: IH> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Chavchanidze Giorgi wrote: >> >> No browser supports XLink it since it too complex and no one wants to >> use it since it's too awkward. IH> Mozilla has supported simple XLinks for years, as have most SVG IH> implementations. All SVG implementation, including SVG Basic implementations on PDAs and SVG Tiny implementations on cellphones. IH> Extended XLink is another matter of course. Yes, XBRL uses it, SVG 1.2 will likely use extended inline XLink, not too many other implementations that I am aware of. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.orgReceived on Thursday, 24 July 2003 19:08:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:22 GMT