Chavchanidze Giorgi wrote: > go[to] > {-o-link:attr(to); > -o-link-source:current;} [snip] > Note also that the main result of whole XLink activity is that after several > years we still can't use links in XML. No browser supports XLink it since it > too complex and no one wants to use it since it's too awkward. <foo xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="whatever"> is not exactly much more awkward than the Opera solution (does need one extra attr and declaring the xlink namespace on your root node). And as Ian has pointed out, Mozilla has supported that for years. The real question is whether linking behavior should be part of the structure or the presentation, of course... -BorisReceived on Thursday, 24 July 2003 12:05:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:22 GMT