- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 23:51:55 +0300 (EEST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Todd Fahrner wrote: > The sample sheet in CSS1 is more prescriptive than descriptive of > common UA behavior. The px values in CSS2 are simply descriptive of > what Mosaic-derivative UAs use(d). - - > > And moving back to a small value like > > 1.12 is strange too. > > That is also based on empirical measurement of legacy behavior, and > does not represent a recommendation. So how should we understand the words "Developers are encouraged to use it as a default style sheet in their implementations."? Note the words "use it as...". Not "use it as basis for...", which is actually how I have read it until now. So it was worse than I realized. -- Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 16:51:58 UTC