W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2003

Re: XBL is (mostly) W3C redundant, and CSS is wrong W3C layer for semantic behavior *markup*

From: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 13:17:44 -0600
Message-Id: <4.1.20030105131513.01d598f0(null)>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

At 07:12 PM 1/5/2003 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote:
>On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Shelby Moore wrote:
>> At 06:33 PM 1/5/2003 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>>> Rather than reply to your points, I will just go straight to the final
>>>> answer since it supercedes your points.
>>>> 
>>>> See the following 2 posts for final answer:
>>>> 
>>>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0104.html
>>>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0102.html
>>>
>>> My post countered both of those posts,
>> 
>> I do not see your claims.  Please address the posts above directly with
>> minimal verbage.
>
>The first is answered on line 218, the second on line 177, of the body of:
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0109.html


Why obfuscate?

I can not count 218 lines quickly.  Please reply succinctly with the
information.



>You have not yet answered _any_ of the points and counters given in that
>post.


I am not going to participate in your attempts at extremely verbose
non-useful discussion.


BTW, I am headed to beach perhaps for most of day...  (79 degrees in Corpus
Christi, TX today)

-Shelby Moore
Received on Sunday, 5 January 2003 14:16:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:19 GMT