W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2003

Re: XBL is (mostly) W3C redundant, and CSS is wrong W3C layer for semantic behavior *markup*

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:30:30 +0000 (GMT)
To: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0301012325340.15896-100000@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Shelby Moore wrote:
> At 06:23 PM 1/1/2003 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> 
>> I don't understand what you think the difference is between a
>> semantic binding and a non-semantic binding.
>> 
>> Could you explain this?
>> 
>> A straight forward definition of "non-semantic binding" first,
>> followed by a straight forward definition of "semantic binding",
>> would be most useful.
> 
> "SEMANTIC BINDING"
> ------------------
>
> The way a semantic markup element is bound to the implementation
> which defines it's semantics.

Could you give a definition of "non-semantic binding" first?

-- 
Ian Hickson                                      )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
"meow"                                          /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/                         `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 1 January 2003 18:30:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:18 GMT