Afternoon wrote: >> I merely pointed out that the UA-only technology Chris proposed is not >> as powerful as some other UA-only technologies could be. > > Which ones? The one my initial message mentioned was site security domains -- any set of pages within a single security domain is considered a single "site". There are other things the UA could do. Site groups (like IE and Mozilla already have for security zones), "same site" matches like the "same site" functionality Mozilla uses for its "only load images from the same site" preference, etc. There are probably other things that could be done there; I don't really care much about the topic, so I've not put much thought into it. ;) -BorisReceived on Tuesday, 9 December 2003 00:52:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:25 GMT