On 9 Dec 2003, at 5:25, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > It is doubtful that the UA will understand what defines the "site" > > better than the author of the site. It seems to me that one could read "a user" instead of "the author" here. I don't believe simple application of a group of styles to pages via a URI substring match will be flexible enough to support the needs of the end user. This is illustrated by the immediate branching of this thread into proposals for a powerful syntax enabling grouping of pages, sites, etc, in multiple different ways, which can be combined by the user to suit their specific needs. > I merely pointed out that the UA-only technology Chris proposed is not > as powerful as some other UA-only technologies could be. Which ones? Ben (q) Ben Godfrey? (a) Web Developer and Designer See http://aftnn.org/ for detailsReceived on Tuesday, 9 December 2003 00:37:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:25 GMT