Re: cjk-ideographic list style : correction and addition

there are many mistake regarding the cjk in that latest wd, I  send my 
comment out several weeks before.

Jungshik Shin wrote:

>On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Jungshik Shin wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I've just noticed that there are several mistakes in the latest WD of
>>CSS module:list.
>>    
>>
>....
>
>  
>
>>Finally, I'm wondering why CJK ideographic list style has the upper limit of
>>only 10^16(10^16-1) when it's possible to represent numbers up to
>>10^72-1 with Chinese numbering system. Well, those large numbers are not
>>much of use, but ....  I'm not saying CSS3 should have them, but FYI,
>>I'm including all of them in List 3 as they're used in Korea. Chinese and
>>    
>>
>
>Some people may have trouble with my email in UTF-8 (I got
>an email saying that off-line.).  I put up
>list1, list2, and list3 in my prev. message at
>
> http://jshin.net/i18n/w3/list1.txt
> http://jshin.net/i18n/w3/list2.txt
> http://jshin.net/i18n/w3/list3.txt
>
>List1 and List 3 are the same as before, but List 2 has changed
>as described below.
>
>
>  
>
>>In addition,  I like to  suggest that two new 'instances' of CJK
>>ideographic list style for Korean, 'korean formal' and 'korean informal'
>>be added  as listed in  List 2.
>>    
>>
>
>I realized that in Korea these days most financial documents use
>Hangul syllables cooresponding to the reading of CJK ideographic
>'numerals'. Therefore, I added a third instance 'korean-formal-hangul'
>and renamed 'korean-formal' to 'korean-formal-hanja'.
>
>Jungshik
>
>  
>