On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Stuart Ballard wrote: > > Ian Hickson wrote: > > @media print { > > fn { content: footnote; } > > fn::footnote { content: contents; } > > } > > > > It requires two rules to specify a footnote. > > > > And I don't really see any sensible way of solving that. > > Does it necesarily? > > Can't you just say that the ::footnote pseudo-element doesn't exist at > all unless "content: footnote" is specified on the relevant element, > and then say that the default value of the "content" property on the > ::footnote pseudo-element is "contents"? So what you are saying is that the 'content' property on the '::footnote' pseudo-element has an initial value ('normal') which computes to 'none' in the usual case but 'contents' if the element itself uses the counter 'footnote' (directly or indirectly) somewhere in _its_ 'content' property? It's a bit of a hack but I suppose it could work. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Thursday, 19 September 2002 13:16:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:16 GMT