Tantek Çelik wrote: > > On 9/5/02 6:02 PM, "fantasai" <fantasai@escape.com> wrote: > > > > > Tantek Çelik wrote: > >> > >> br { line-break-after:always } > > > > br:after {content: "\A"; white-space: pre} ? > > Right, this is exactly the nonsense hack that I am saying there is no need > for. There was no need to introduce "\A" as a "formatting instruction", and .... Well, assuming \A gets replaced by a line feed character according to the CSS escaping rules [1], I don't see anything nonsensical about this example here. White-space is pre, so line breaks should be honored. Or am I missing something here? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/syndata.html#escaped-characters ~fantasaiReceived on Friday, 6 September 2002 00:29:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:16 GMT