- From: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 02:43:25 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
'text-script'
| auto
| *Use the first character descendant*, after any
| reordering due to character direction and bi-
| directionality, which has an unambiguous script
| identifier to determine the dominant script of
| the element's content. *This determines the
| computed script value.* Each textual component of
| the element may however behave in typographical
| related behaviors as dictated by its script
| identifier. In the absence of any textual
| components with a clear script identifier (or no
| textual content at all), the computed value is
| 'Latin'.
|
| none
| Indicates the script is *unknown or is not
| significant* to the proper formatting of this
| element.
|
| <script>
| A script definition in conformance with
| [ISO15924]. *All textual components of the
| element must behave in typography related
| behaviors as dictated by this script value, not
| the inherent script value of these textual
| components.*
How can 'auto' and <script> act differently on a run of
non-dominant-script text when 'auto' computes to a <script>
and this computed value is what's inherited?
How would one handle these situations?
<p>
# | _
## # # # ## ### ____"__ | ' |_|
# # # # # # # # ----- __|__ |_|
# # # # # # ### |_____| | ------
# # # # # # # # / | \ / \ |\ |_
## # ## ## ### .| / \_ / '|_
#
(more Chinese text...)
</p>
(30 US $ [jiu] [shi]...)
<p>
_
### # # # # # ### # # # ### # ## # # |_|
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # |_|
## # # # # ### # ## ### # # # # ### # # ------
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # |\ |-
# # # # # # ### # # # # # # # # ## # / `'_
_
/|\
/ | \
------ | (more Chinese text)...
|
|
</p>
(Final Fantasy [shi] [yi] [ge]...)
Received on Thursday, 28 November 2002 02:42:56 UTC