- From: Lachlan Cannon <luminosity@members.evolt.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 15:01:53 +1100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Bert Bos wrote: > The CSS working group published a new draft, the first one of the CSS3 > Border module. It contains some new ideas for creating interesting > borders, in particular for using images or patterns for the border. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-border-20021107/ From 2: "These tests will not be conformance full tests but will be intended to provide users with a way to check if a part of this specification is implemented at least a minima or not or, on the contrary, not implemented at all." Shouldn't that read "a minima or, on the contrary,..."? I'm assuming a minima is latin here, and wondering why an English specification includes latin terms? And if it is latin why the markup around it is simply <i> and </i> instead of a span marking up the language. WRT to 3.2, I'd like it if there were some way of controlling the wave border style a little more. When I first envisaged the property before looking at the example I was thinking more of the waved underline MS Word uses on incorrect words. Would it be better if there were two wave styles rather than an extra property to control them? compact-wave and wave, perhaps? -- Lach __________________________________________ Web: http://illuminosity.net/ E-mail: lach @ illuminosity.net MSN: luminosity @ members.evolt.org __________________________________________
Received on Friday, 8 November 2002 23:09:33 UTC