On 11/6/02 7:13 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > This change is already in the CSS2 errata: > http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-19980512-errata.html#x54 I've often wondered why there's no link to the errata from the affected text in the spec. Is there some philosophical reason to /not/ do so? -- kevin c smith tel: 410.571.9462 k.smith@tatnet.com http://www.tatnet.comReceived on Thursday, 7 November 2002 15:28:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:17 GMT