- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 05:27:21 -0600
- To: Tapio Markula <tapio1@gamma.nic.fi>, www-style@w3.org
Tapio Markula wrote: > The content can be in principle an entire document or a fragment. > BOTH cause problems. Both are also against the spirit of CSS, which is a way of _styling_ documents, not of inserting arbitrary content... > content-url-type:fragment would behave like <? require ''; ?> - the content > would be embedded as such and the default display type would be 'inline'. Yep. This is the perfect example of what CSS should _not_ support, IMO. If you want content processing, use a content processing tool. > The problem is that replaced element can in principle be a phrase How does this situation arise? What do you mean by "phrase" in this context, exactly?
Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 06:27:26 UTC