Tapio Markula wrote: > The content can be in principle an entire document or a fragment. > BOTH cause problems. Both are also against the spirit of CSS, which is a way of _styling_ documents, not of inserting arbitrary content... > content-url-type:fragment would behave like <? require ''; ?> - the content > would be embedded as such and the default display type would be 'inline'. Yep. This is the perfect example of what CSS should _not_ support, IMO. If you want content processing, use a content processing tool. > The problem is that replaced element can in principle be a phrase How does this situation arise? What do you mean by "phrase" in this context, exactly?Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 06:27:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:17 GMT