Re: Idenitfier equivalence in CSS

Etan Wexler wrote:
> 
> The exact case equivalences need listing.  Since the Unicode Standard has already 
> listed them, a normative reference to the latest UnicodeData file will suffice.  This 
> assumes that CSS will not permit special case equivalents.

There is already a normative reference to UNICODE, and recent drafts have a 
further reference to CHARMOD. That should suffice.


> Then we need to note in all syntax definitions that the identifiers (and names, as in 
> HASH tokens) allow escape sequences that correspond to the given characters or to the 
> case equivalents of the given characters.

That's already in the grammar.

-- 
Ian Hickson
``The inability of a user agent to implement part of this specification due to
the limitations of a particular device (e.g., non interactive user agents will
probably not implement dynamic pseudo-classes because they make no sense
without interactivity) does not imply non-conformance.'' -- Selectors, Sec13