- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:55:17 +0100
- To: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Ann Navarro wrote: > > If you're saying the CSS working group has left it's documents in the > control of 2-3 companies who only desire to codify their current (at > times questionable) practices [...]. No, I'm saying that the CSS working group editors are mainly from 2-3 companies. (Supported by many invited experts, W3C staff, and contributors from member companies, of course.) The whole W3C process is all about specs controlled by companies. For instance, it is the member companies who get to vote on the specs. This isn't new. :-) -- Ian Hickson ``The inability of a user agent to implement part of this specification due to the limitations of a particular device (e.g., non interactive user agents will probably not implement dynamic pseudo-classes because they make no sense without interactivity) does not imply non-conformance.'' -- Selectors, Sec13
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 13:55:24 UTC