- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 21:20:35 +0100
- To: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Etan Wexler wrote: > Following are comments on the CSS3 Line module Working Draft > (<http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-linebox-20020515>). In future, please separate minor typographical, wording or grammar suggestions from possible changes to the semantics of the specification. While the editor of the spec will be very interested in all the comments, the majority of the working group and other participants in this mailing list do not really care about minor grammatical changes, while we _do_ care about proposed changes to the meaning of the spec. Thanks for your comments though! > Change "root inline element" to "root inline object" The correct term is "root inline box". -- Ian Hickson ``The inability of a user agent to implement part of this specification due to the limitations of a particular device (e.g., non interactive user agents will probably not implement dynamic pseudo-classes because they make no sense without interactivity) does not imply non-conformance.'' -- Selectors, Sec13
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2002 16:20:40 UTC