Re: a:hover and a:active and named anchors

Stuart Ballard says:
  >
 > If we do that we should also define additional pseudoclasses similar to
 > :active and :hover that apply to all elements.
 >
 > Perhaps :force-active and :force-hover?
 >
 > Stuart.

I realize that some people may want to apply :hover and :active to
elements that don't "do" anything (but I can't figure out why). My
concern is really only that named anchors are matching the a:hover and
a:active selectors when they did not match in CSS1.