Recipients of the email sent to the list a few minutes ago should be VERY cautious of clicking on the link at the end of the email. It seems VERY similar to the Party worm. See: http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2843181,00.html Andrew Watt In a message dated 29/01/02 20:13:14 GMT Standard Time, jswee0tu@mwc.edu writes: > To whom it may concern, > > As much as I would enjoy participating in a productive argument > relevant to CSS specification and conformance, I have an obligation to > obey, and a warning message to broadcast: Earlier today my anti-virus > software, Norton Antivirus 2002, detected two occurrences of a suspicious > attachment that have since been quarantined and deleted. The point of > origin appears to be from <A HREF="mailto:www-style-request@w3.org">www-style-request@w3.org</A> or <A HREF="mailto:chris@w3.org">chris@w3.org</A>, > although I may be misguided. One might speculate on the actual source of > this file. I'm beginning to wonder if I should have subscribed to this > list. I hope for the sake of W3C that the recent dialogue was not from > members of the World Wide Web Consortium. > > Sender chris <<A HREF="mailto:chris@w3.org">chris@w3.org</A>> > Recipient: <A HREF="mailto:www-style@w3.org">www-style@w3.org</A> > Subject: Some questions > [<A HREF="mailto:W32.Klez.E@mm">W32.Klez.E@mm</A>] > >Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2002 15:25:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:12 GMT