W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2002

Re: conformance (was layout solutions blah blah blah)

From: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:13:59 -0800
To: Jesse McCarthy <mccarthy36@earthlink.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <0GQI00GUC4VLK2@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net>
From: Jesse McCarthy <mccarthy36@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: conformance (was layout solutions blah blah blah)
Date: Fri, Jan 25, 2002, 5:56 AM

> "Tantek Celik" <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote on 1/24/02 11:16:29 PM:
>
>>
>>IE5/Mac was
>>released almost two years ago with fully conformant HTML4 and CSS1[1]
>> ..
>>So, I'd say that leaves the burden of proof in the naysayers' court.
>
> I guess your definition of full CSS 1 conformance somehow allows for a broken
> @import implementation?

Such remarks carry no substance without _at_a_minimum_ a URL to a valid
example that _clearly_ demonstrates the statement.

The same problem exists with simply hurling a statement like "such and such
is not compliant".

This is not comp.sys.browser.putdown. This is www-style.

Please raise your standards.

Thanks,

Tantek
Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 11:09:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:12 GMT