Re: XBL is (mostly) W3C redundant, and CSS is wrong W3C layer for semantic behavior *markup* from L. David Baron on 2002-12-31 (www-style@w3.org from December 2002)

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@fas.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 21:49:50 -0500
To: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@fas.harvard.edu>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <20021230214950.A12606@is04.fas.harvard.edu>

On Monday 2002-12-30 20:29 -0600, Shelby Moore wrote:
> >  Additional
> >    namespace collisions (with non-standardized functions, anyway, where
> >    we don't have a good reason) break existing web pages that use
> >    functions with those names.
> 
> Namespace issues have been addressed in XML and other standards coming such
> as XEvents.

I'm not talking about XML namespaces.  I'm talking about the namespace
of functions in the scripting language used.  Your response doesn't
answer the point I made.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >

Received on Monday, 30 December 2002 21:49:51 UTC