W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2002

Re: XBL is (mostly) W3C redundant, and CSS is wrong W3C layer for semantic behavior *markup*

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 22:04:17 +0000 (GMT)
To: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@fas.harvard.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0212302203010.9121-100000@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Mon, 30 Dec 2002 (that's today), Ian Hickson (that's me) wrote:
>
> XUL is simple a markup language like CSS; it doesn't require any other
> language, but typically CSS and XBL are used to specify the rendering.

Er, that was supposed to read:

: XUL is simple a markup language like HTML; it doesn't require any other
: language, but typically CSS and XBL are used to specify the rendering.

(The first mention of CSS should have been HTML.)

-- 
Ian Hickson                                      )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
"meow"                                          /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/                         `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 30 December 2002 17:04:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:18 GMT