On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, REFSTRUP,JACOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote: > > p {color: green; /* missing "}" */ > q {color: blue;} > samp {color:red;} That should parse as something like (froom memory): Selector: p Block: Declaration: Property: 'color' Value: 'green' Ignored Declaration: Comment: ' missing "}" ' Property: 'q' Block: Identifier: 'color' Token: ':' Identifier: 'blue' Identifier: 'samp' Block: Identifier: 'color' Token: ':' Identifier: 'red' Error: Unexpected EOF (Expected '}') ...and therefore is equivalent to the following stylesheet: p { color: green } The bit from the comment to the end is definitely ignored as being an unrecognised syntax for a declaration. The spec is extremely clear about this, I think. The bit I'm not clear about is whether 'q' gets treated as an identifier or a property. I think I may be mixing two parts of the parsing process, and that it would start of as an identifier and then be considered as a property only if the syntax for that declaration was correct? I'm not sure. David can probably tell us... -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Friday, 13 December 2002 14:00:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:17 GMT