W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2002

Too classy? (Was: storing info in XSL-FO)

From: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 04:18:08 EDT
Message-ID: <22.2d73fcf4.2a935540@aol.com>
To: howcome@opera.com, www-tag@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
In a message dated 20/08/2002 08:29:23 GMT Daylight Time, howcome@opera.com 

> > All HTML tells you is that something is a paragraph, a level 1 
> > heading, a table, monospaced, preformatted, and a few other things. 
> > <SINGER>Madonna</SINGER> is more semantic than <SPAN>Madonna</SPAN>. 
> You can combine the two:
>   <span class="singer">Madonna</span>
> which preserves your semantic, while still using HTML and staying
> compatible with hundreds of millions of browsers. Using the CLASS
> attribute you can tranform any XML markup into HTML without losing
> information.


This, I humbly suggest, is a recipe for disaster.

Do you suggest we create a namespace mechanism (or something functionally 
equivalent) for the value of a class attribute?

How else are we to disambiguate,
<span class="title">Queen Elizabeth</span>
<span class="title">School janitor</span>
<span class="title">SVG Unleashed</span>

in a narrative along the (contrived) lines of "Queen Elizabeth visited the 
school and the school janitor showed her a copy of SVG Unleashed in the 
school library"?

How do you suggest we capture structural/contextual semantic information 
within a class attribute?

This all seems too class-y for my taste. :)


Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 04:19:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:03 UTC