W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2002

Re: Float overflowing behavior

From: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:14:08 +0400
To: Bill Daly <billdalynj@yahoo.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200208161214.08882.lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>

On Wednesday 14 August 2002 6:37 pm, Bill Daly wrote:
|  --- Jan Roland Eriksson <jrexon@newsguy.com> wrote:
|  > And yet the real solution is so fantastically
|  > simple?
|  >
|  >   <http://css.nu/exp/layer-ex3b.html>
|  >   <http://css.nu/exp/layer-ex3b.html>
|  >   <http://css.nu/exp/layer-ex3d.html>
|
|  I don't see that as a solution, so much as a hack.
|  The empty div which you add in those examples has no
|  relevance to the structure of the document, and does
|  not belong.  It is being used purely for
|  presentational purposes.  While I have seen this in
|  use, and have used it myself in some cases, I don't
|  see it as the proper way for this effect to be
|  accomplished.

Example which I posted on thi slist 25.10.2001:
http://htmltests.newmail.ru/css/display-inline_block.html
Screenshot (MS IE6)
http://htmltests.newmail.ru/css/display-inline_block-MSIE6.png

So, once more: if you are not happy with 'float' use 'inline-block'

-- 

Vadim Plessky
http://kde2.newmail.ru  (English)
33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE
http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html
KDE mini-Themes
http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/
Received on Friday, 16 August 2002 04:07:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:15 GMT