[+BCC to WAI PF] > I'll leave it to the editor(s) to address your suggestion about > the text of the finding, but it seems to me that just omitting > XSL-FO from that phrase won't address the issue you raise > about whether it's appropriate to use XSL-FO to store > information. > > It looks like a new issue. A new issue for TAG perhaps, but the WAI PF WG have been tackling such issues for a number of months now as part of the work on the XML Accessibility Guidelines. I refer you to checkpoint 2.1 of the current working draft:- http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xmlgl-20010829#cp2_1 - 2.1 Ensure all semantics are captured in markup in a repurposeable form. XML Accessibility Guidelines W3C Working Draft 29 August 2001 I'm not sure how much of this is an architecural issue rather than accessibility; I suppose that this is for the chairs of the relevant groups to decide. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> . :Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 15:14:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:15 GMT