W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2002

Re: background-attachment

From: Kai Lahmann <kl@3dots.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 04:34:30 +0200
Message-ID: <3D5B1336.20202@3dots.de>
To: "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org

Eric A. Meyer wrote:

> At 18:13 +0200 8/14/02, Kai Lahmann wrote:
>> an (maybe silly?) Idea of a change of this. The image shouldn't be 
>> fixed related to the topleft corner of the viewport, but of the next 
>> parent element, which has any scrolling mechanism (thinking of 
>> overflow:scroll or a textarea).
>    I believe that there are already two interoperable implementations 
> of fixed-attachment background images as applied to arbitrary 
> elements, so it's too late to change the meaning of 'fixed'.  You 
> could propose a new value that has the effect you desire.

year - and many incompatible. Maybe a third value 'overflow', which 
results in this behavior?

Kai Lahmann
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 22:33:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:03 UTC