W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2001

Re: CSS3 Syntax and Grammar considerations

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:18:15 +0200
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@fas.harvard.edu>
Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <p6dhqtsamb2hvuhq8oroj3lmeqjvij0jlj@4ax.com>
* L. David Baron wrote:
>Why do you think the complexity CSS2 allows for future extensions is too

I don't see any good reason to allow at-rules or blocks as property
value or why selectors are optional, thus the grammar is hard to parse
for me. Stricter grammar eases writing a parser for that grammar.

>> Syntax delegation:

>It's hard for me to tell which side you're advocating here.  However, I
>really don't find any of the possible solutions very elegant.

Neither do I. The best approach would be to define the grammar of
at-rules in the relevant modules and collect their syntax in the syntax
module. This would create a dependency for the Syntax module on possibly
all other modules.

Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2001 11:19:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:26:59 UTC