W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2001

Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?

From: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 23:50:40 +0000
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20011025201129.95CD823FF7@hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru>
On Thursday 25 October 2001 17:43, Tantek Celik wrote:
|   From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
|   Subject: Re: Re:Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?
|   Date: Wed, Oct 24, 2001, 4:51 PM
|
|   > Also sprach Andrew McFarland:
|   [...]
|   > "Fixed positioning is supported by Opera and Mozilla.
|
|   And IE5/Mac of course. ;-)

Great!
|
|   Tantek
|
|   P.S. In answer to the rhetorical question in the subject line which
| started this thread - it is possible to devise such a feeble system (I
| presume this is referring to CSS2's lack of vertical block centering) when
| version two of a standard becomes a recommendation before version one is
| even fully implemented.  The "web developer" audience who would choose to
| point out that the emperor had no clothes in this case were too busy with
| working with what little CSS1 they could work with to bother giving CSS2 a
| critical look.
|
|   This is another reason why no draft should exit CR without _at_least_ two
|   interoperable (passing the respective test suite in the same way)
|   implementations (available, shipping, not experimental) for every feature
| in that draft.  Just look at http://w3.org/TR/ to see how many RECs there
| are that never met this criteria.
|

very well said! 
I fully support this.

| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|- Browse Different.                          
| http://www.microsoft.com/mac/ie/

-- 

Vadim Plessky
http://kde2.newmail.ru  (English)
33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE
http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html
KDE mini-Themes
http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2001 16:11:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:11 GMT