- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 01:12:15 +0200
- To: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
- CC: Web style list <www-style@w3.org>
Etan Wexler wrote: > The existing implementations nullify what would have been my > primary objection. However, certain issues remain. > > Will we seek a method to include filter definitions in CSS (as by an > '@filter' at-rule)? Why? > How easily written are the filters necessary to produce the equivalent > of the proposed 'box-shadow' property? Very simple. > What will become of 'text-shadow'? How does 'text-shadow' interact > with 'filter'? I would suggest it be deprecated. > If CSS3 will include the 'filter' property, it should drop the > developing 'font-effect' property. I agree. the halo effect in the specification was easily reproduced in svg. > The values 'engrave' and 'emboss' > are obsoleted by 'filter'. The value 'outline' can be obsoleted by > SVG's stroke properties. Yes. -- Chris
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 19:13:26 UTC