Re: css3 :nth-child() WD

At 11:13 02/03/2001 +0100, Daniel Glazman wrote:
>Robin Berjon wrote:
>> My gut feeling agrees with this point, but I'm not sure why. Do you have
>> any specific reason ? Anyway, this doesn't concern so-called cron notation
>> which is what I have in mind.
>
>Well, for the moment, whitespace is (a) unsignificant, or (b) a
>combinator. I don't want to add a third case. And :not() takes a
>selector for argument...

Yes, that fits with the gut feeling I had. My (new, improved, released as
soon as I get feedback on SAC or early next week otherwise) parser wouldn't
mind, but I see how this could cause problems to some parsing strategies.

-- robin b.
Learn from your parents mistakes - use birth control.