W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2001

Re: css3 :nth-child() WD

From: Jonas Sicking <sicking@bigfoot.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:18:37 +0100
Message-ID: <02da01c0a345$33c6a060$5412a8c0@Milwork08>
To: "Daniel Glazman" <glazman@netscape.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
Daniel Glazman wrote:
>  Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> > I agree my proposal is a bit more complicated but it also adds much
extra
> > functionallity, such as rules for "three lines white, three lines
gray..."
>
> tr:nth-child(6n+1), tr:nth-child(6n+2), tr:nth-child(6n+3)
>      { background-color : silver }
> tr:nth-child(6n+4), tr:nth-child(6n+5), tr:nth-child(6n)
>      { background-color : white}

which will become very long when you try to do something like:

table.stocks > tr:nth-child(10n+1..5) { background-color: silver; }
table.stocks > tr:nth-child(10n+6..10) { background-color: white; }

/ Jonas Sicking
Received on Friday, 2 March 2001 13:17:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:08 GMT