W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2001

Re: css3 :nth-child() WD

From: Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 18:14:03 +0100
Message-Id: <4.1.20010302181215.00a17c30@mail.knowscape.net>
To: Ian Turner <vectro@stop.mail-abuse.org>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <sicking@bigfoot.com>, Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, www-style@w3.org 
At 09:03 02/03/2001 -0800, Ian Turner wrote:
>I think this may be a bit clearer to use than the 6n+1 to 10 notation
>proposed earlier.

I totally agree ! cron-style notation is by far easier to read. I also
think it's generally far more intuitive than the an+b notation. I think
more people will be used to the former.

-- robin b.
Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. -- Alan Turing
Received on Friday, 2 March 2001 12:12:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:08 GMT