- From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:46:07 +0300
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai@escape.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai@escape.com] > This is what I think should happen: > > 1.) UA determines which stylesheets are applicable according > to persistent/preferred/alternate rules, media, and > supported style languages. So I guess you 'vote' for the type attribute when more than one stylesheets are present? > 2.) If there are stylesheets from more than one language > applicable, the UA uses only stylesheets from the first > language encountered (all of them). This follows the > precedent of "preferred" stylesheets--the first preferred > sheet is applied, as are any other later stylesheets that > are part of that set. Does this means that the author will be responsible on putting his preferred stylesheet (language) before others? Wouldn't it be better to give priority to a transformation language when having to do with XML? > 3.) If the language cannot cope with multiple stylesheets, > then only the first linked stylesheet is used. Again this moves all responsibility to the author and the order he writes his PIs. > Alternatively, later stylesheets could be favored. Can you please give an example on this one? Sorry, I don't really get it. Kindest regards, Manos
Received on Friday, 29 June 2001 11:47:23 UTC