- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:38:54 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Chris Lilley wrote: > > Making it optional means that editing tools have no way to figure out if > > a stylesheet is CSS or XSL other than by attemptig to resolve the URL. > > This is not a good idea. > > How else do you propose linking to a document without knowing its MIME > type in advance? Are you arguing for or against, here ..... yes exactly, how is an authoring tool to know unless that markup says so directly. I notice that XML Spy 4.0 for example assumes that all xml-stylesheet PIs are for XSL, and removes any existing CSS ones if it adds an XSL one, with the message 'replacing existing XSL style sheet" -- Chris
Received on Friday, 29 June 2001 08:38:57 UTC