W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2001

Re: CSS1 compliance/support (was Re: @version rule)

From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 20:21:07 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <15205.42387.84585.382251@lanalana.inria.fr>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@hotmail.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
Ian Hickson writes:
> (Bert - note the comments re: the errata at the bottom of this mail)
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> > [1] pre _and_ post current errata, since the errata didn't change
> >     section 4.1.3, see my try to discuss this and the report on 25th may
> >     this year on this list; btw.: appendix B must be changed, too; it's
> >     very obvious, that it wasn't intended to exclude the underscore...
> >     and yes, I'm somewhat disappointed that my report got ignored.
> Oops, thanks for pointing that out. Regarding whether it's a change or an
> error, the distinction is simple: changes are informative, corrections to
> known errors are normative. The Changes section is merely a placeholder
> for proposals so that authors of new UAs know to be careful and not rely
> on the relevant sections on the spec to stay the same, whereas the other
> sections indicate that the WG is agreed that the change should take effect
> immediately.
> Bert: Could you add to the errata item that the underscore change also
> applies to section 4.1.3 and appendix B? Thanks!

I added an errata for section 4.1.3, but what exactly should I write
about appendix B?

  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos/                              W3C/INRIA
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 30 July 2001 14:21:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:26:58 UTC