* Ian Hickson wrote: >On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >>> >>> Which level should IE6 claim to support? >> >> Microsoft claims full CSS Level 1 compliance (or support, don't know >> the exact wording). > >I said _should_. They should claim whatever is true; I don't know what will be true, IE 6 isn't released yet. Regarding some version number based @version rule, it shouldn't claim anything and it doesn't need to. The proposal is bad, especially because there are a lot of features optional in CSS and media dependend. >> I sympathize with the idea of an @version statement. I would be great >> if I can specify "process this block only if you support all used >> @rules/property-value pairs/selectors/etc." since implementing just >> _some_ features of CSS may break documents, as shown above. > >But then should IE6 claim to support to support 'ex'? If it does, yes. >How about 'float'? If it supports floats they way I used it, it should claim that it supports it. -- Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de 25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/Received on Sunday, 29 July 2001 23:07:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:10 GMT