- From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 15:46:03 +0300
- To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net]
> I came to the conclusion, that I don't like the @link rule syntax. The
> current proposal [4] is one of
>
> @link Selector1 = this(Attribute); /* [link1] */
> @link Selector1 = first(Attribute); /* [link2] */
> @link Selector1 = content; /* [link3] */
> @link Selector1 @with Selector2 = this(Attribute); /* [link4] */
> @link Selector1 @with Selector2 = content; /* [link5] */
>
> the selector argument is misplaced here. The CSS way is
>
> Selector1 { @link ... }
Actually, one other CSS way is
@link Selector1 > @link Selector2
and
@link Selector1 @link Selector2
and more. The syntax is descriptive in a markup_kind_of_way. Of course I
don't like the "@with" either.
> I strongly recommend to put the :subject pseudo-class back
Could you please point me to a resource dc:about ":subject" ?
Kindest regards,
Manos
Received on Saturday, 28 July 2001 08:47:16 UTC