> -----Original Message----- > From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] > I came to the conclusion, that I don't like the @link rule syntax. The > current proposal [4] is one of > > @link Selector1 = this(Attribute); /* [link1] */ > @link Selector1 = first(Attribute); /* [link2] */ > @link Selector1 = content; /* [link3] */ > @link Selector1 @with Selector2 = this(Attribute); /* [link4] */ > @link Selector1 @with Selector2 = content; /* [link5] */ > > the selector argument is misplaced here. The CSS way is > > Selector1 { @link ... } Actually, one other CSS way is @link Selector1 > @link Selector2 and @link Selector1 @link Selector2 and more. The syntax is descriptive in a markup_kind_of_way. Of course I don't like the "@with" either. > I strongly recommend to put the :subject pseudo-class back Could you please point me to a resource dc:about ":subject" ? Kindest regards, ManosReceived on Saturday, 28 July 2001 08:47:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:10 GMT