W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2001

RE: Answers to comments on W3C Selectors Last Call WD

From: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@appcomp.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:21:51 -0600
Message-ID: <86BF1235655FD411BF4100C0F017B8A301F7DE@SERVER1>
To: www-style@w3.org
>01 feb 2001, www-style, jyasskin@hotmail.com 
>why a new Selectors version and not XPath which is a REC ? In chronological
order, Selectors were a REC
>long time before the birth of XPath. It is just an improvement.
Furthermore, other specs than CSS want to 
>use the CSS selecting mechanism and not XPath. 

That's not quite what I suggested. W3C Selectors are great for the current
version of CSS. I was asking if it is reasonable to migrate to XPath in
future versions of CSS.

Jeffrey Yasskin, MCSD

-----Original Message-----
From: glazman@netscape.com [mailto:glazman@netscape.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 6:08 AM
To: www-style@w3.org
Subject: Answers to comments on W3C Selectors Last Call WD


The attached document contains all the comments related to W3C Selectors
Last Call WD and the corresponding answers.

Thanks _a lot_ to all reviewers, your help is priceless.

Note: François Yergeau sent me a mail with a long list of specific 
comments about the french version of the document. Mostly typos and 
translation problems. All integrated in that version.

</Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2001 08:25:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:08 GMT