Re: background-position in NC4.7x

great, i've been putting off learning how to do layers...  guess i've got
to suck it up and learn them now! : ^ )

where is a good place that would have a tutorial about this?

--
Jesse Kaufman                           |       WebSurf Internet Access
Administration / Web Development        |       www.websurf.net
glandix@websurf.net                     |       Ph: 316.945.7873
www.linuxfreak.com/~glandix             |       Fax: 316.946.9944
--

<<< Vim is a REAL man's text editor.  I don't know why anyone else would
    even bother with sissy programs like emacs, or even worse...  pico!  >>>


On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Luis Ferro wrote:

> The only way would be emulating it with layers. Its the way NC is built...
> 
> Sorry if that wasn't much helpfull...
> Luis Ferro
> 
> Jesse Kaufman wrote:
> 
> > i've just run into this, myself...  i'm trying to put a background who's
> > position is 0% 100% and repeats on the y-axis...  works great in IE and
> > Mozilla, but in Netscape it draws it as if the position was 0% 0%...  i'd
> > like to know if you find out a fix, as i really need it for a site i'm
> > developing...
> >
> > gLaNDix
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Kaufman                           |       WebSurf Internet Access
> > Administration / Web Development        |       www.websurf.net
> > glandix@websurf.net                     |       Ph: 316.945.7873
> > www.linuxfreak.com/~glandix             |       Fax: 316.946.9944
> > --
> >
> > <<< Vim is a REAL man's text editor.  I don't know why anyone else would
> >     even bother with sissy programs like emacs, or even worse...  pico!  >>>
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Gabriel Rivera wrote:
> >
> > > Hi:
> > > Netscape 4.7x doesn't seem to undertand this:
> > >
> > > BODY {
> > > background-image.......
> > > background-repeat.......
> > > background-position: top right; /* NC fails rendering the "right" */
> > > }
> > >
> > > How can I make this work?
> > > Are there alternative ways to do this?
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot.
> > > Gabriel.
> > >
> 

Received on Friday, 22 September 2000 13:10:29 UTC