- From: Matthew Brealey <webmaster@richinstyle.com>
- Date: 16 Oct 2000 14:08:36 -0000
- To: www-style@w3.org
You wrote: > > >> Check CSS3 proposals again. > > > > Which one? > > Sorry, I thought it was obvious that since we were talking > about the UI, I was referring to the UI draft. > > > Please be specific. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-css3-userint-20000216.html#color Yes. But that says border-style takes its value from the UI. And border: windowborder wouldn't work for: http://kde.themes.org/php/pic.phtml?src=themes/kde/shots/943815508.jpg or http://kde.themes.org/php/pic.phtml?src=themes/kde/shots/940609412.jpg for example, because "'border-style' are still given values taken from the system", but border-style doesn't allow images. > >> although David Baron and I have proposed ::inside and > >> ::outside to make this easier (see archives). > > > > Yes, although it was :inside and :outside, rather than the slightly > > pointless and confusing ::inside. > > Reread the selectors draft proposal. Pseudo-elements now have two colons > to separate them from pseudo-classes in extensible implementations thus > allowing for more efficient rule matching. I've read it. The point was that you/David proposed one colon, whereas the current proposal uses two, which you used here. > > Please be specific. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-css3-selectors-20001005/#pseudo-elements I didn't ask you to be specific about that.... PS. Removed erroneous reply-by. Sorry. [Was making Outlook all red.]
Received on Monday, 16 October 2000 10:08:38 UTC